Original Research

Prof. Marius Nel: Leading Pentecostal scholar and key contributor to African Pentecostal studies

Frederick J. de Beer, Marius Nel

Received: 16 Aug. 2025; Accepted: 14 Aug. 2025; Published: 19 Sept. 2025

Copyright: © 2025. The Author(s). Licensee: AOSIS.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background: This article presents an interview and reflective dialogue conducted with Professor Marius Nel, acknowledging his substantial and sustained contributions to Pentecostal theology and related disciplines.

Objectives: The aim of this article is to provide Professor Nel with the opportunity to elaborate on his scholarly work and to reflect on the scope and significance of his academic legacy within African and global contexts.

Method: This article is structured around a series of thematic questions addressing key areas of his research. Topics include the history of the Apostolic Faith Mission (AFM) of South Africa, Pentecostal and African Pentecostal theology and hermeneutics, syncretism, the prosperity gospel, his role within a Reformed theological faculty, Bible translation in South Africa, the book of Daniel and apocalyptic literature and his perspectives on issues such as same-sex practices, gender identity, homosexuality and LGBTIQ+ persons. A brief biographical introduction precedes the interview and concludes with a comprehensive list of his publications.

Results: This article serves as a scholarly recognition of Professor Nel’s academic contribution and highlights the continued relevance of his work. It provides a reflective engagement with his discourse on the theological, historical and socio-cultural dimensions of Pentecostalism in Africa and beyond.

Conclusion: Professor Nel is recognised as a leading scholar in Pentecostal and African Pentecostal studies, whose work continues to influence academic and ecclesial conversations globally.

Contribution: This article honours Professor Nel’s scholarly achievements and highlights the broader impact of his work, offering valuable insight into one of the leading voices in contemporary Pentecostal scholarship.

Keywords: Marius Nel; Pentecostal scholar; AFM of SA; African Pentecostalism; African Pentecostal hermeneutics.

Introduction

Marius Nel was born on 09 January 1960. He ranks among the most prolific scholars in South Africa, particularly within the Pentecostal tradition. He presently holds the Research Chair in Ecumenism: Pentecostalism and Neo-Pentecostalism and serves as Research Professor within the Unit for Reformed Theology at the Faculty of Theology, Potchefstroom Campus, North-West University (NWU: Biography of Marius Nel 2020). His scholarly contributions not only extend to the field of Pentecostal theology but also traverse a diverse array of theological disciplines, including Old Testament studies, New Testament studies and church history.

He is one of the most prolific academics in South Africa, especially within the Pentecostal traditions. He has made significant contributions not only within the domain of Pentecostalism but also across a wide range of other theological disciplines. His skills and expertise are described as follows: Narratology, Church History, Hermeneutics, Literature Studies, Literary Criticism, Early Christianity, Christian Theology, Theology, Biblical Studies, Biblical Theology (ResearchGate n.d.). Notably, he was honoured as the most productive researcher at the annual North-West University Research Awards for four consecutive years (2017–2020) (News@NWU 2021).

In recognising the best works of Pentecostal biblical scholarship through the annual granting of Awards of Excellence recognition, The Foundation for Pentecostal Scholarship 2025 Award of Excellence for short works was conferred to Prof. Marius Nel for his article ‘Pentecostals and Premillennialist Dispensationalism: An Unhappy Marriage’ (Nel 2023:33–65), in recognition of his efforts to broaden and enrich the knowledge and understanding of Pentecostal issues throughout Christendom (The Foundation for Pentecostal Scholarship 2025).

He was also honoured by being named a 2024 Top Scholar by ScholarGPS for his publication record, the impact of his work and the notable quality of his scholarly contributions, which have placed him amongst the top 0.5% of all scholars worldwide according to the most recent 2024 ScholarGPS rankings.

In recognition of his substantial impact on Pentecostal theology and beyond, it was deemed fitting to engage him in dialogue, affording him the opportunity both to elaborate further upon his scholarly endeavours and to reflect upon the scope and significance of his academic legacy and achievements.

What follows is a series of questions pertaining to his body of work, providing space for him to articulate his current perspectives on these matters. This is followed by a comprehensive list of his publications.

Background

You are a well-known and respected theologian and researcher within Pentecostal circles. In what Christian tradition did you grow up?

I was born in the NG Kerk (Dutch Reformed Church) and was converted to Pentecostalism when my mother died, and my stepmother introduced me to the Apostolic Faith Mission (AFM) of SA. Shortly after I was baptised in water, I received the infilling of the Spirit.

You completed a diploma in Theology in 1982. Where did you complete your training for the ministry?

I studied at the University of Pretoria, Unisa, the AFM Theological College and Radboud University. While pursuing my graduate studies at a university that applied a Reformed theological paradigm, I found it critical to complete the diploma course that the AFM of SA set for prospective ministers as well. In this way, I was exposed to the Pentecostal ethos and paradigm.

You were for many years involved in the local church, pastoring local assemblies. Where did you serve the church?

I have served in assemblies since 1982 in AFM Randfontein assembly, AFM Lime Acres and Daniëlskuil assembly, AFM Krugersdorp assembly (for 20 years), Alberton Lewensentrum and AFM Taberna Dei assembly in Polokwane. In 2017, I was appointed to the chair of Pentecostal hermeneutics at North-West University.

You have obtained various other theological qualifications. What additional academic training did you follow?

I studied at the University of Pretoria, the University of South Africa (Unisa) (BA, BD, MA) and the AFM Theological College (Diploma in Theology). I completed my doctorates at Unisa (in Practical Theology, with Prof. Louis Heyns as promoter), writing on the space the Church needs to create to ensure young people will follow the Lord; the University of Pretoria (in Church History, with Prof. Hoffie Hofmeyr as promoter), researching the development of the doctrine of divine healing in the Pentecostal movement; the University of Pretoria (in Old Testament studies, with Prof. Dirk Human as promoter), engaging in an exegetical interpretation of Daniel 1 and 2; and the University of Radboud, Nijmegen in the Netherlands (in New Testament studies, under Prof. Jan van der Watt), on Mark 13’s apocalyptic narrative.

Many may be unaware that, as a young student, you sustained serious injuries in a near-fatal accident, which resulted in an extended period of hospitalisation. Did this experience play a role in shaping your decision to pursue the study of theology and how it influenced the course of your life?

During the winter holiday of my first year at the University of Pretoria, where I was studying library and information sciences, I visited a farm in the Nietverdiend region. On the first day of the visit, I accompanied the young people as they took their grandmother back to her farm later that evening. I was sitting at the back of the truck when it rolled on the dirt road, and I was injured. The skull cracked, causing bleeding on the brain and brain damage, damaging the facial nerves on the left side of the face, and I lost hearing on the left side. The left eye’s tear gland was destroyed, and because of the paralysis, the eyelid could not close properly. As a result, eventually, I lost the eye. During the recovery period in the hospital, I experienced that the Lord called me to full-time ministry. The following year, I started with theological studies despite several health challenges because of the injuries during the accident.

Questions concerning his scholarly contributions to the pioneering and establishment of Pentecostal research

Question 1

You published various articles and books on the history of the Apostolic Faith Mission of South Africa (AGS van SA; AFM of SA). These include writings on John G Lake, PL le Roux, the development of theological training within the AFM, a historical perspective on demonisation, deliverance and divine healing and the unification process of the AFM (e.g. numbers 1, 2, 19, 31, 42, 56, 62, 69, 70, 78, 83, 99, 109, 136, 152, 154, 179, 181, 182, 209 and 210 in the list of publications). In what way did you contribute to the AFM’s historiography?

During my doctoral studies, I investigated the history of the doctrine of divine healing. I served for 24 years as a lecturer in church history at AFMTC (later Auckland Park Theological Seminary). With the AFM’s centennial celebrations in 2008, CUM (Christelike Uitgewersmaatskappy) and Christian Art Distributors offered to publish a commemorative album of the AFM’s history. We used Dr Isak Burger’s doctoral study for the first 50 years (Burger 1987), and I wrote the Church’s history from 1958 to 2008 (Burger & Nel 2008). I learned that it is essential to know enough about church history to understand the situatedness of each doctrine accepted (or rejected) by the Church.

Question 2

You have published numerous works on Pentecostalism and Pentecostal theology (e.g. numbers 6, 7, 10, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 24, 51, 59, 70, 72, 74, 77, 80, 82, 84, 86, 87, 88, 90, 92, 94, 95, 96, 98, 99, 100, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 110, 113, 117, 119, 120, 121, 123, 124, 125, 126, 132, 138, 140, 141, 145, 149, 150, 194, 196, 198, 199 and 201 in the list of publications).

In these works, you are addressing a wide range of subjects, including violence against the displaced, Pentecostal responses to structural poverty, the early Pentecostal movement’s preferential option for the marginalised, fundamentalism and Pentecostalism, the distinctives of Pentecostal preaching and the defining elements of a Pentecostal spirituality.

Many of your publications engage with themes of particular significance within Pentecostal theology, such as the Apostolic period as depicted in Luke and Acts, prophecy, speaking about God, glossolalia and the baptism in the Spirit, the liturgical space and the development of the doctrine of divine healing.

However, certain of your works also explore areas that might appear, at first glance, to be at odds with Pentecostal theology. These include studies on the three early Fathers of the Eastern Orthodox tradition, the notion of Pentecostal theology as a contradictio in terminis, Pentecostalism and the Early Church, Pentecostal ecumenical impulses and the distinctive ways in which Pentecostals engage with the Old Testament. What do you think was your contribution to Pentecostal theology?

If I had made any contribution to Pentecostal theology, I think it was in my study of the movement’s history, including the development of its doctrine and Pentecostal hermeneutics. I can only hope that my contribution will encourage readers to engage with difficult themes from a distinctive Pentecostal hermeneutical perspective.

As explained, early Pentecostals interpreted the Bible through their charismatic encounters with God, finding in Scripture the language to describe their experiences and the means to expect more divine assistance and guidance. For that reason, they did not read all texts in a literalistic sense but waited on the Spirit to disclose its meaning for their specific circumstances and needs. There was a real danger that they might have heard what they wanted to hear. However, in many instances, their testimonies bore witness to the fact that the insights generated by meditating on the Bible were the result of the Spirit working in their hearts and minds. I attempted to engage with themes such as Eastern Orthodoxy and the issue of LGBTIQ+ people from this hermeneutical angle, trying to interpret texts in a way that reflects the distinctive Pentecostal ethos.

Question 3

You published on hermeneutics, e.g. the influence of hermeneutics on theological education: A case study at North-West University, Christian hermeneutics in South Africa and also on Pentecostal hermeneutics, e.g. attempting to define a Pentecostal Hermeneutics, Pentecostal hermeneutical considerations about women in ministry, Pentecostal hermeneutic encountering science, Pentecostal pacifist homiletics and the change in the hermeneutical stance in the Church on war (e.g. numbers 13, 76, 85, 91, 93, 97, 103, 104, 105, 118, 127, 137, 184, 199 and 203 in the list of publications). You, however, also developed an African Pentecostal hermeneutics (e.g. number 9, 195, 197, 200 and 202 in the list of publications). What did you see as its distinctives?

The historical development of Pentecostalism, including its origins in the early 20th-century revivals, begins with key figures such as Charles F. Parham and William J. Seymour, who played significant roles in shaping the movement. The Azusa Street revival is highlighted as a pivotal event that catalysed the global spread of Pentecostalism.

The theological distinctives of Pentecostal theology are emphasised in its unique hermeneutics and practices. Pentecostal theology emphasises conversion, sanctification, Spirit baptism, healing, spiritual gifts and eschatological expectations of an imminent return of Christ. Distinctive practices include speaking in tongues, which is often misunderstood as the sole defining feature of Pentecostalism. Its historical roots trace back to movements like Pietism and the Holiness movement, influencing Pentecostal beliefs and practices.

Another distinctive is the way Pentecostals interpret Scripture. They do so through a Lukan lens, focusing on the Book of Acts instead of Pauline theology, sometimes the nearly exclusive focus among Reformed theologians. The ‘Latter Rain’ motif is central in their thinking, linking the promises of the Old Testament and the New Testament to contemporary experiences. Pentecostal hermeneutics prioritise personal experience and community over systematic theology, leading to diverse interpretations. Doctrine is less important to them; encountering God through his Spirit is paramount, and they conclude that it serves as a condition for saying anything about God (or doing theology).

Their worship services are characterised by experiential elements, emphasising personal testimonies and spontaneous prayers. The expectation of divine healing and miracles is integral, with healing seen as part of salvation. Eschatological beliefs drive the urgency of evangelism, with a focus on the imminent return of Christ.

One can categorise Pentecostalism into groups emphasising different works of grace, with three works (Wesleyan) vs. two works (Oneness). The ‘full gospel’ concept includes salvation, sanctification, Spirit baptism, divine healing and the second coming of Christ. The four-fold pattern of distinctives (without the emphasis on sanctification) is prevalent across various Pentecostal denominations, reinforcing core beliefs.

Question 4

You also wrote about African syncretism, touching on syncretism in Pentecostalism in the Global South and the ‘prosperity message’ as a syncretistic deviation of the Gospel (e.g. numbers 12, 122, 129, 135, 147, 197, 205, 207 and 208 in the list of publications). What are the dangers and challenges you saw?

Pentecostal spirituality and African Traditional Religion (ATR) both reflect primal spirituality, where the spiritual and material realms are closely connected. In both, prophets or diviners act as intermediaries, addressing spiritual forces (e.g., evil spirits or angry ancestors) believed to cause problems, such as poverty. In some cases, Pentecostals incorporated traditional, indigenous practices into their worship services, raising the question of to what extent this represents a forced or artificial blending of different elements, suggesting a lack of genuine understanding of the original elements.

Additionally, Neo-Pentecostalism’s prosperity teaching adapts ATR beliefs by embracing this dual worldview. It teaches that manipulating the invisible (spiritual) world can directly influence visible (material) conditions, making prosperity or poverty spiritually determined. It has become a popular theme, given the new elite in Africa’s emphasis on materialism. African prosperity preachers have also adopted American mind-cure and positive thinking ideas (from E.W. Kenyon), promoting the belief that prosperity is a divine right of believers, emphasising faith and positive confession as the means to compel God to act. It views prosperity as an integral part of salvation achieved through Christ’s atonement. Such a view compromises the New Testament’s emphasis on servanthood, stewardship and disciples’ involvement with the poor and needy, as well as marginalised and ‘the other’, in faithfulness to their Lord.

Some prosperity teachings also rely on private revelation over biblical authority, promote false doctrines and allow unaccountable leadership, especially in financial matters. These abuses harm the reputation of classical Pentecostalism, especially as critics often fail to distinguish it from prosperity movements.

Despite some positive elements, movements like the New Apostolic Reformation deviate from the core message of the gospel. Pentecostal leaders should lovingly confront the emerging movement of independent churches, taking care to explain their theological errors and encouraging them to adopt biblically grounded theology. They should also be encouraged to establish schools that teach traditional Christian doctrine.

In conclusion, the prosperity gospel in Africa represents a syncretistic blend of Pentecostalism, ATR and American New Thought. While it addresses deep spiritual concerns in African contexts, it often deviates from biblical Christianity and should be reformed to align with orthodox theology.

Question 5

A part of your contribution to Pentecostal theology was within a Reformed faculty. How did it affect your work?

During the apartheid-led government, Afrikaans-speaking established churches, such as the Dutch Reformed Church and the Reformed Churches of South Africa, influenced government policy and ensured that subsidised state universities established theological faculties to train their candidate ministers. Hence, other churches had to take care of the training of their own pastors. The state recognised only the degrees awarded by state universities. Hence, ministers of different denominations had to register for graduate and postgraduate studies at these institutions, which exclusively employed the Reformed theological paradigm.

In 2016, North-West University signed an agreement with the AFM of SA to provide training for their pastors. At that stage, NWU was invested in training candidate ministers for the Reformed Churches of South Africa (GKSA). As part of their agreement, NWU established a research chair in Pentecostal theology, and I had the privilege of serving in this capacity for the first 9 years. My experience was that close cooperation with colleagues from other denominations was fruitful and stimulating.

Question 6

You were also involved with Bible translations (e.g. numbers 156, 159, 164, 167 and 174 in the list of publications). In what way did you contribute to Bible translation in South Africa?

When CUM (Christelike Uitgewersmaatskappy) and Christian Art Distributors invited me to participate in their Nuwe Lewende Vertaling, it was a privilege. Later, it included a revision of that popular translation and several commentaries based on it, such as the Eenvolumekommentaar and Bybel in Praktyk. I was also privileged to contribute in a small way to the 2020 Bybel of the Bible Society of South Africa with other scholars.

Translating a text from the original requires a lot of study to ensure that one’s interpretation is well-founded, as all translation always involves interpretation. The words we use hold associations that can differ in their use by various persons and institutions, making the translation of a biblical text a complicated matter.

Question 7

You also published about the book of Daniel and also specifically on Daniel’s apocalypticism (e.g. numbers 14, 20, 22, 25, 27, 29, 30, 34, 36, 37, 41, 43, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 53, 58, 60, 63, 65, 66, 67, 183, 184, 189 and 204 in the list of publications). Tell us more.

Prof. Dirk Human was my promoter for a doctoral study on Daniel 2, which stimulated my thinking to write about the rest of the book, including the apocalyptic visions found in Daniel 7–12. Apocalyptic thinking consists of the assumption that history will end with Christ’s return to the earth, leading to the judgement of people who rejected Christ and the establishment of a new earth where God will reside with his children. Jesus Christ also employed apocalyptic thinking patterns in describing the future of the Christian Church, and I concluded a doctoral study under the supervision of Prof. Jan van der Watt at Radboud University in the Netherlands on Mark 13.

Question 8

You published on the controversial topics of same-sex practices, gender identity and homosexuality (e.g. 44, 112, 143, 151 and 176 in the list of publications). You wrote a book on LGBTIQ+ people and Pentecostals (e.g. 11 in the list of publications), where you touched on, among others, LGBTIQ+ people in die biblical world, LGBTIQ+ people in Africa and early Judaism. You also touched on the biological, psychological, anthropological, sociological and philosophical perspectives. Given your research and African Pentecostals’ response to and Pentecostal reactions to LGBTIQ+ people, what were your conclusions?

The issue of LGBTIQ people and the challenges of their participation in Pentecostal churches has engaged my mind for a long time. While in ministry, I had many conversations with such people, and I heard them relating incidents where Christians reviled and rejected them, sometimes even forcing them to leave the Church. In considering the issue in terms of the relatively few passages in Scripture, I realised I must also consider insights from other fields, such as biology, sociology, psychology, anthropology and philosophy. I concluded that same-sex orientation is a complicated issue that biblical authors did not necessarily know of. Although it seems that the Bible, in general, disapproves of the expression of homosexual tendencies, what became clear to me was that the rejection of such people by believers is an abomination in God’s eyes. The Church consists of sinners who have found Christ and reconciliation with God, and its mission is to proclaim divine grace to all sinners. Hence, they welcome sinners in their midst, expecting the Holy Spirit to convince them of their sins and bring them to saving faith in Christ. And that includes people with a presumed same-sex orientation, including the variety of people described as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intergender, queer and more. The fact is that the Church may not marginalise people simply because they differ from Christian expectations.

Conclusion

Prof. Marius Nel is a highly accomplished scholar in the field of theology, with a particular focus on Pentecostal and African Pentecostal studies. His academic contributions have played a pivotal role in shaping scholarly discourse on the theological, historical and socio-cultural dimensions of Pentecostalism on the African continent. What sets Prof. Nel apart is not only the depth of his expertise in this specific area but also the remarkable breadth of his intellectual pursuits. While his core research explores the theological development, liturgical practices and hermeneutical methods within Pentecostalism, his scholarly reach extends far beyond. He has engaged meaningfully with subjects ranging from biblical exegesis and church history to the interface between religion and society, producing a body of work that reflects both diversity and rigour.

His prolific publication record is testimony to his scholarly ingenuity and commitment to advancing theological knowledge. Prof. Nel has authored numerous peer-reviewed articles, books and conference papers, many of which are recognised for their originality and their contribution to contemporary theological debates. His writings are frequently cited in both local and international academic circles (Scholar.Google n.d.), evidencing his influence within the broader scholarly community. Furthermore, his ability to connect traditional theological concerns with current ecclesial and societal challenges demonstrates an academic relevance that transcends narrow disciplinary boundaries.

The esteem in which he is held is further underscored by the institutional recognition he has received over the years. Prof. Nel has been the recipient of multiple awards from North-West University, including accolades for being the most productive senior researcher. Such honours reflect not only his research output but also the quality and impact of his work. Additionally, his designation as a C2-rated researcher (NWU: Biography of Marius Nel: 2020) by the National Research Foundation of South Africa affirms his status as an established scholar with a sustained record of excellence. This rating recognises researchers who enjoy considerable international recognition for the quality and impact of their recent research outputs.

In conclusion, Prof. Marius Nel stands as a distinguished figure in contemporary theological scholarship. His deep engagement with Pentecostalism, particularly in the African context, has enriched the field and opened new avenues for research and reflection. Yet, his intellectual curiosity and scholarly versatility ensure that his contributions are not confined to one domain. Through his extensive publications, institutional leadership and academic mentorship, Prof. Nel continues to shape theological thought in South Africa and beyond. His achievements exemplify what it means to be a dedicated scholar whose work bridges tradition and innovation, theory and practice, faith and critical inquiry, illustrated by the following list of publications as per Appendix 1.

Acknowledgements

The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article. The author, M.N., serves as an editorial board member of this journal. The peer-review process for this submission was handled independently, and the authors had no involvement in the editorial decision-making process for this manuscript. The authors have no other competing interests to declare. Arrangements have been reviewed and approved by the affiliated university in accordance with its policy on objectivity in research.

F.J.d.B. wrote the article. F.J.d.B and M.N. contributed equally to the conceptualisation and editing of the manuscript and share first authorship. All authors contributed to the article, discussed the results, and approved the final version for submission and publication.

This article followed all ethical standards for research without direct contact with human or animal subjects.

The authors thank the National Research Foundation of South Africa (NRF) for partly funding this study. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the NRF.

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analysed in this study.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and are the product of professional research. They do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any affiliated institution, funder, agency or publisher. The authors are responsible for this article’s results, findings and content.

The identity of the author was known to the reviewers from the outset, and a single-blind review process was followed for this article. This is the exception to the rule, as the journal’s current policy, which follows a double-blind review process, is subject to the editor’s approval.

References

Appendix 1: List of publications

Monographs

1. Burger, I. & Nel, M., 2008, The fire falls in Africa, CUM, Vereeniging.

2. Nel, M., 2008, The Apostolic faith mission 1908–2008: A centenary album, CUM, Vereeniging.

3. Nel, M., 2014, Of that day and hour no one knows: Mark 13, Theology in Africa, vol. 3, LIT, München.

4. Nel, M., 2015, Aspects of Pentecostal theology: Recent developments in Africa, Theology in Africa, vol. 6, LIT Verlag, München.

5. Nel, M., 2017, ‘He changes times and seasons’: Narratological-historical investigation of Daniel 1 and 2, LIT Verlag, Zürich.

6. Nel, M., 2018, Pacifism and Pentecostals in South Africa: A new hermeneutic of nonviolence, Routledge, Abingdon.

7. Nel, M., 2019a, African Pentecostalism and eschatological expectations: He is coming back again, Cambridge Scholars, Newcastle upon Tyne.

8. Nel, M., 2019b, An African Pentecostal Hermeneutics: A distinctive contribution to hermeneutics, Wipf & Stock, Eugene, OR.

9. Nel, M., 2020a, LGBTIQ+ people and Pentecostals: An African Pentecostal hermeneutic perspective, LIT, Zürich.

10. Nel, M., 2020b, The prosperity Gospel in Africa: An African Pentecostal hermeneutical consideration, Wipf & Stock, Eugene, OR.

11. Nel, M., 2021a, Creation and Pentecostals: Hermeneutical considerations of Genesis 1–2, Cambridge Scholars, Newcastle upon Tyne.

12. Nel, M., 2021b, Daniël, De Prediking van het Oude Testament, Kok, Utrecht.

13. Nel, M., 2022, God, suffering, and Pentecostals, Wipf & Stock, Eugene, OR.

14. Nel, M., 2023, Pentecostals and the Doctrine of the Trinity: Some hermeneutical considerations, Cambridge Scholars, Newcastle upon Tyne.

15. Nel, M., Van Der Watt, J.G. & Van Rensburg, F.J. (eds.), 2015, The New Testament in the Graeco-Roman world: Articles in honor of Abe Malherbe, Theology in Africa, 4, LIT Verlag, München.

16. Sin, 2014, Oxford dictionary of the Bible and ethics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Articles in peer-reviewed journals

• 17. Bondo, M.G. & Nel, M., 2022, ‘Charismatic experiences in the Congo Evangelistic Mission Churches: A review of some practices’, In die Skriflig 56(1), a2841. https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v56i1.2841

• 18. Meyfarth, L. & Nel, M., 2023, ‘Israelvisie, die Nuwe Suid-Afrika en “Afrikaners”’, In die Skriflig 57(1), a2917. https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v57i1.2917

• 19. Meyfarth, L. & Nel, M., 2024, ‘Christene wat Joodse gebruike opneem: Die Hebrew Roots-leerstellings, beoordeel vanuit Handelinge 10:9–29, Handelinge 15:1–35 en Galasiërs 2 en pentekostalistiese hermeneutiek’, Verbum et Ecclesia 45(1), a2976. https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v45i1.2976

• 20. Nel, M., 1985, ‘Pastoraat aan die siek kind’ [Pastorate and the sick child], Forum Pinkster Teologie 1–3.

• 21. Nel, M., 1986, ‘Fundamentalisme – ‘n ontsnappingsroete’ [Fundamentalism – an escape route], Forum Pinkster Teologie 2(3), 12–15.

• 22. Nel, M., 1993, ‘Die ontwikkeling van die leerstelling van Goddelike genesing in die Apostoliese Geloof Sending van Suid-Afrika: Enkele kerkhistoriese perspektiewe’ [The development of the doctrine of divine healing in the AFM of SA: Some church historical perspectives], Skrif en kerk 14(2), 277–291. https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v14i2.1073

• 23. Nel, M., 2000, ‘The way to healing: Faith and prayer’, Spirit & Church 2(2), 249–264.

• 24. Nel, M., 2001a, ‘Literêre genre van die Daniëlverhale’ [Literary genre of the Daniel tales], In die Skriflig 35(4), 591–606. https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v35i4.576

• 25. Nel, M., 2001b, ‘Semiotiese ontleding as nuttige en noodsaaklike eksegetiese hulpmiddel’ [Semiotic analysis as a useful and necessary exegetical aid], Old Testament Essays 14(1), 89–101.

• 26. Nel, M., 2001c, ‘The role of healing in the establishment of the Pentecostal movement’, Studia Historiae Ecclesiasticae XXVII(1), 163–181.

• 27. Nel, M., 2002a, ‘A literary-historical analysis of Daniel 2: Two powers in opposition’, Acta Theologica 22(1), 77–97. https://doi.org/10.4314/actat.v22i1.5396

• 28. Nel, M., 2002b, ‘Daniël 1 as wysheidsliteratuur: Bevestiging van die vergeldingsleer’ [Daniel 1 as wisdom literature: Confirmation of the retribution doctrine], Old Testament Essays 15(3), 780–798.

• 29. Nel, M., 2002c, ‘Die Hellenisties-Romeinse wêreld en die ontstaan van apokaliptiek en gnostisisme’ [The Hellenistic-Roman world and the origins of apocalyptic and Gnosticism], Verbum et Ecclesia 23(2), 452–467. https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v23i2.1214

• 30. Nel, M., 2003a, ‘Daniël 2:29–36 – Enkele eksegetiese kwessies’ [Daniel 2:29–36 – Some exegetical issues], Old Testament Essays 16(2), 358–369.

• 31. Nel, M., 2003b, ‘Dit was onnodig! Refleksies van die destydse Suid-Kaapse Distrikvoorsitter oor die skeuring van die Pinkster Protestantse Kerk in 1958’ [It was unnecessary! Reflections of the former chair of the Southern Cape District on the schism of the Pentecostal Protestant Church in 1958], Studia Historiae Ecclestiasticae XXVIX(1), 110–121.

• 32. Nel, M., 2003c, ‘Narratologiese ondersoek na Daniël 1: God beloon getrouheid’ [Narratological analysis of Daniel: God rewards faithfulness], Acta Theologica 23(1), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.4314/actat.v23i1.5411

• 33. Nel, M., 2003d, ‘Wêreld- en tydsbeskouing in antieke kulture’ [View of world and time in ancient cultures], Hervormde Teologiese Studies 59(4), 1349–1366. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v59i4.699

• 34. Nel, M., 2003e, ‘Zoroastranisme en die ontstaan van apokaliptiese denke’ [Zoroastrianism and the origin of apocalyptic thinking], Hervormde Teologiese Studies 59(4), 1423–1442. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v59i4.702

• 35. Nel, M., 2004a, ‘‘n Analise van Daniël se loflied in Daniël 2:20–23’ [Analysis of Daniel’s song of praise in Daniel 2:20–23], Old Testament Essays 17(4), 595–609.

• 36. Nel, M., 2004b, ‘Bevrydingshermeneutiek en postkoloniale kritiek: ‘n evaluering’ [Hermeneutics of liberation and postcolonial criticism: An evaluation], Ned Geref Teologiese Tydskrif 45(3–4), 631–641.

• 37. Nel, M., 2004c, ‘Gebruik van twee tale in die Daniëlboek’ [Use of two languages in the Book of Daniel], Verbum et Ecclesia 25(1), 236–252. https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v25i1.269

• 38. Nel, M., 2004d, ‘Sosio-historiese konteks en temas in drie Joodse apokaliptiese geskrifte’ [Socio-historic context and themes in three Jewish apocalyptic writings], In die Skriflig 38(2), 311–331. https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v38i2.432

• 39. Nel, M., 2004e, ‘Verskuiwing in die lewens- en tydsbeskouing van die inwoners van Siro-Palestina (1200–500 vC)’ [Shifts in the view of life and time of the inhabitants of Syro-Palestine [1200–500 BCE]], Ned Geref Teologiese Tydskrif 45(1&2), 63–76.

• 40. Nel, M., 2005a, ‘Homoseksualiteit en die Ou Testament: ‘n Studie van tekste’ [Homosexuality in the Old Testament: A study of texts], In die Skriflig 39(2), 365–378.

• 41. Nel, M., 2005b, ‘Huidige Daniëlnavorsing, en die pad vorentoe’ [Contemporary Daniel research and the road ahead], Old Testament Essays 18(3), 777–789.

• 42. Nel, M., 2005c, ‘P L le Roux, Dutch Reformed missionary, Zionist preacher and leader of the Apostolic Faith Mission of South Africa, and the origin of some of the African Independent Churches in Southern Africa’, Ned Geref Teologiese Tydskrif 46(1–2), 200–208.

• 43. Nel, M., 2005d, ‘Pentateugtradisies in die boek van Daniël’ [Pentatech traditions in the Book of Daniel], Hervormde Teologiese Studies 61(4), 1321–1337. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v61i4.490

• 44. Nel, M., 2005e, ‘Versoening in Joodse apokaliptiese literatuur’ [Reconciliation in Jewish apocalyptic literature], Verbum et Ecclesia 26(1), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v26i1.219

• 45. Nel, M., 2006a, ‘Contribution of the Dead Sea scrolls to textual criticism and understanding of the canonical Book of Daniel’, Ned Geref Teologiese Tydskrif 47(3–4), 609–619.

• 46. Nel, M., 2006b, ‘Daniel 7, mythology and the creation combat myths’, Old Testament Essays 19(1), 156–170.

• 47. Nel, M., 2006c, ‘Semiotiese ontleding van Daniël 1’ [Semiotic analysis of Daniel 1], Hervormde Teologiese Studies 62(2), 501–519. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v62i2.369

• 48. Nel, M., 2006d, ‘Semiotiese ontleding van Daniël 2’ [Semiotic analysis of Daniel 2], Hervormde Teologiese Studies 62(3), 1041–1056. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v62i3.383

• 49. Nel, M., 2006e, ‘Vergelyking tussen die genesingsteologie van John G Lake en Hannes Jonker’ [Comparison of the healing theology of John G. Lake and Hannes Jonker], Studia Historiae Ecclesiasticae 32(1), 263–284.

• 50. Nel, M., 2006f, ‘Vyandigheid in apokaliptiese literatuur – die Daniëlboek’ [Animosity ini apocalyptic literature – the Book of Daniel], In die Skriflig 40(2), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v40i2.345

• 51. Nel, M., 2007a, ‘Calendrical data, social groups and animosity in early Jewish apocalyptic texts’, Ned Geref Teologiese Tydskrif 48(3–4), 559–573.

• 52. Nel, M., 2007b, ‘Pentecostals’ reading of the Old Testament’, Verbum et Ecclesia 28(2), 524–541. https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v28i2.120

• 53. Nel, M., 2008a, ‘A Church historical perspective on demonisation, deliverance and the A.F.M. of S.A’, Studia Historiae Ecclestiasticae 34(1), 385–410.

• 54. Nel, M., 2008b, ‘Eunug in die Antieke Naby Ooste’ [Eunuch in the Ancient Near East], Acta Theologica 28(1), 126–142. https://doi.org/10.4314/actat.v28i1.48872

• 55. Nel, M., 2008c, ‘Konteks(te) waarbinne apokaliptiese geskrifte gedurende die intertestamentêre periode floreer het’ [Contexts in which apocalyptic writings flourished during the intertestamental period], Hervormde Teologiese Studies 64(3), 1327–1345. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v64i3.78

• 56. Nel, M., 2008d, ‘The second coming of Christ as the golden key to unlock the Book of Daniel: An analysis of a Pentecostal interpretation of the dream in Daniel 2’, In die Skriflig 42(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v42i3.276

• 57. Nel, M., 2009a, ‘Die siek kind in die charismatiese gemeente’ [The sick child in the charismatic congregation], Praktiese Teologie in Suid-Afrika 24(1), 115–133.

• 58. Nel, M., 2009b, ‘Violence and the Daniel tales in Children’s Bibles’, HTS Theological Studies 65(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v65i1.150

• 59. Nel, M., 2010a, ‘Opstanding in die boek Daniël’ [Resurrection in the Book of Daniel], Ned Geref Teologiese Tydskrif 51(1–2), 121–130.

• 60. Nel, M., 2010b, ‘The postrabbinic apocalypse, Sefer Zerubbabel, and the Hebrew Bible’, Acta Patristica et Byzantina 21(2), 270–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/10226486.2010.11879130

• 61. Nel, M., 2011, ‘The process of unification of the A.F.M. of S.A’, Studia Historiae Ecclesiasticae XXXVIII(2), 121–141.

• 62. Nel, M., 2012a, ‘Daniël 2 as satire’ [Daniel 2 as satire], HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 68(1), a979. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v68i1.979

• 63. Nel, M., 2012b, ‘Daniel 3 as satirical comedy’, Ned Gerf Teologiese Tydskrif 53(3&4), 218–228. https://doi.org/10.5952/53-3-4-263

• 64. Nel, M., 2012c, ‘The signs of the Messiah (‘otot hamaschiach) and Jewish apocalypticism’, Journal of Early Christian History 2(2), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/2222582X.2012.11877265

• 65. Nel, M., 2013, ‘Daniel 9 as part of an apocalyptic book?’, Verbum et Ecclesia 34(1), a707. https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v34i1.707

• 66. Nel, M., 2014a, ‘A comparison between the worldviews of the Gospel of Mark and Q’, Journal of Early Christian History 4(2), 76–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/2222582X.2014.11877305

• 67. Nel, M., 2014b, ‘A critical evaluation of theological distinctives of Pentecostal theology’, Studia Historiae Ecclesiasticae XL(1), 291–309.

• 68. Nel, M., 2014c, ‘A hundred years of theological training in the Apostolic Faith Mission of South Africa’, Acta Theologica 34(1), 108–126. https://doi.org/10.4314/actat.v34i1.7

• 69. Nel, M., 2014d, ‘Function of space in Daniel 1’, In die Skriflig/In Luce Verbi 48(2), a1778. https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v48i2.1778

• 70. Nel, M., 2014e, ‘Implikasies van ontwikkelings in die leerstelling van goddelike genesing binne die Pinksterbeweging’ [Implications of the development of the doctrine of divine healing in the Pentecostal movement], In die Skriflig 48(1), a1792. https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v48i1.1792

• 71. Nel, M., 2014f, ‘Pentecostalism and the early church: On living distinctively from the world’, Journal of Theology for Southern Africa 153, 141–159.

• 72. Nel, M., 2014g, ‘The Gospel of Mark in light of its apocalyptic worldview’, Journal of Early Christian History 4(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/2222582X.2014.11877298

• 73. Nel, M., 2015a, ‘“Not peace but the sword:” Jesus and the sword in Matthew’, Neotestamentica 49(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1353/neo.2016.0001

• 74. Nel, M., 2015b, ‘An attempt to define the constitutive elements of a Pentecostal spirituality’, In die Skriflig 49(1), a1864. https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v49i1.1864

• 75. Nel, M., 2015c, ‘Attempting to define a Pentecostal hermeneutics’, Scriptura 114, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.7833/114-0-1044

• 76. Nel, M., 2015d, ‘Benutting van liturgiese ruimte in Pinksterkerke’ [Utilisation of lilturgical space in Pentecostal churches], HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 71(2), a2844. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v71i2.2844

• 77. Nel, M., 2015e, ‘Mark’s distinctive emphasis on the temple’s torn curtain’, In die Skriflig 49(2), a1823. https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v49i2.1823

• 78. Nel, M., 2015f, ‘What is “the sign of the Son of man in heaven” (Mt 24:30)?’, In die Skriflig 49(1), a1876. https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v49i1.1876

• 79. Nel, M., 2016a, ‘“John G. Lake as a fraud, con man and false prophet:” Critical assessment of a historical evaluation of Lake’s ministry’, Studia Historiae Ecclesiasticae 42(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.17159/2412-4265/2016/1134

• 80. Nel, M., 2016b, ‘Attempting to develop a Pentecostal theology of worship’, Verbum et Ecclesia 37(1), a1661. https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v37i1.1661

• 81. Nel, M., 2016c, ‘Baptised in the Spirit and fire: A single or double baptism?’, Neotestamentica 50(1), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1353/neo.2016.0041

• 82. Nel, M., 2016d, ‘Development of theological training and hermeneutics in Pentecostalism: A historical perspective’, Studia Historiae Ecclesiasticae 42(2), 191–207. https://doi.org/10.25159/2412-4265/1322

• 83. Nel, M., 2016e, ‘Rather Spirit-filled than learned! Pentecostalism’s tradition of anti-intellectualism and Pentecostal theological scholarship’, Verbum et Ecclesia 37(1), a1533. https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v37i1.1533

• 84. Nel, M., 2016f, ‘Remembering and commemorating the theological legacy of John G. Lake in South Africa after a hundred years’, Studia Historiae Ecclesiasticae 41(3), 147–170. https://doi.org/10.17159/2412-4265/2015/400

• 85. Nel, M., 2016g, ‘The notion of the Holy Spirit as Paraclete from a Pentecostal perspective’, In die Skriflig 50(1), a2095. https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v50i1.2095

• 86. Nel, M., 2017a, ‘A distinctive Pentecostal hermeneutic: Possible and/or necessary?’, Acta Theologica 37(2), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.18820/23099089/actat.v37i2.6

• 87. Nel, M., 2017b, ‘“Apostoliese tye as onherhaalbaar en uniek”: Pinksterkerke en Lukas-Handelinge’ [Apostolic times as unrepeatable and unique: Pentecostal churches and Luke-Acts], Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe 57(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.17159/2224-7912/2017/v57n3a8

• 88. Nel, M., 2017c, ‘Church and war: A change in hermeneutical stance among Pentecostals’, Verbum et Ecclesia 38(1), a1749. https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v38i1.1749

• 89. Nel, M., 2017d, ‘Fundamentalism and Pentecostalism: Blood nephews?’, Journal of Theology for Southern Africa 158, 57–71.

• 90. Nel, M., 2017e, ‘Pentecostal hermeneutical considerations about women in ministry’, Studia Historiae Ecclesiasticae 43(1), 122–137. https://doi.org/10.17159/2412-4265/2016/2126

• 91. Nel, M., 2017f, ‘Pentecostal talk about God: Attempting to speak from experience’, HTS Teologiese StudiesTheological Studies 73(3), a4479. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v73i3.4479

• 92. Nel, M., 2017g, ‘Profesie in die Hebreeuse Bybel, by vroeë Christene en kontemporêre Pentekostaliste: ‘n Vraag van kontinuïteit en diskontinuïteit’ [Prophecy in the Hebrew Bible, early Christians and contemporary Pentecostalists: A question of continuity and discontinuity]’ LitNet Akademies (Godsdienswetenskappe) 14(3), 514–541. https://www.litnet.co.za/profesie-die-hebreeuse-bybel-die-vroee-christendom-en-eietydse-pinksterkerke-n-vraag-oor-kontinuiteit-en-diskontinuiteit/.

• 93. Nel, M., 2017h, ‘Re-enactment leading to transformation: A critical assessment of the distinctives of Pentecostal preaching’, Stellenbosch Theological Journal 3(1), 285–307. https://doi.org/10.17570/stj.2017.v3n1.a13

• 94. Nel, M., 2017i, ‘“Son of man” in the Gospel of Mark’, In die Skriflig 51(3), a2096. https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v51i3.2096

• 95. Nel, M., 2017j, ‘The Pentecostal movement’s view of the continuity of tongues in Acts and 1 Corinthians’, In die Skriflig 51(1), a2198. https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v51i1.2198

• 96. Nel, M., 2018a, ‘A Pentecostalist reads Tamar’s story of rape and humiliation with a hermeneutical awareness’, Journal of Theology for Southern Africa 161, 89–99.

• 97. Nel, M., 2018b, ‘Pentecostals and the pulpit: A case study of the Apostolic Faith Mission of South Africa’, HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 74(2), 4664. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v74i2.4664

• 98. Nel, M., 2018c, ‘Pentecostal ecumenical impulses: Past and present challenges’, In die Skriflig 52(1), a2330. https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v52i1.2330

• 99. Nel, M., 2018d, ‘Pentecostal pacifist homiletics: A hermeneutical concern’, Journal of Pentecostal Theology 27(2), 307–325. https://doi.org/10.1163/17455251-02702007

• 100. Nel, M., 2018e, ‘Pentecostal pacifist impulse and the violent God of the Hebrew Bible: A balancing act of Hermeneutics’, Old Testament Essays 31(2), 423–441. https://doi.org/10.17159/2312-3621/2018/v31n2a9

• 101. Nel, M., 2018f, ‘Pentecostal Prophecy, a Pastoral response to the challenges of South African Xenophobia’, Conspectus, Special Editionn, Desember 2018, 20–39. https://www.sats.edu.za/nel-pentecostal-prophecy-pastoral-xenophobia.

• 102. Nel, M., 2018g, ‘Pentecostal spirituality in dialogue with three early fathers of the Eastern Orthodox tradition: A question of continuity’, Journal of Early Christian History 8(2), 49–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/2222582X.2018.1454262

• 103. Nel, M., 2018h, ‘“Pentecostal theology” as contradictio in terminis: A perspective on the past and present’, Scriptura 116(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.7833/116-1-1275

• 104. Nel, M., 2018i, ‘Teologie as wetenskap: Noodsaak van dialoog’, Koers 83(10), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.19108/KOERS.83.1.2309

• 105. Nel, M., 2019a, ‘Moedertaal in die kerk: Die Apostoliese Geloof Sending van Suid-Afrika (AGS van SA) en Afrikaans as ‘n illustrasie van die rol wat moedertaal in die kerk speel’, Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe 59(2), 177–191. https://doi.org/10.17159/2224-7912/2019/v59n2a1

• 106. Nel, M., 2019b, ‘North-West University conference: Evil spirits in Africa’, In die Skriflig 53(4), a2530. https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v53i4.2530

• 107. Nel, M., 2019c, ‘Pentecostals and the marginalised: A historical survey of the early Pentecostal movement’s predilection for the marginalised’, HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 75(1), a5184. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v75i1.5184

• 108. Nel, M., 2019d, ‘Pentecostals, LGBTIQ+ people and the Bible: An alternative Pentecostal hermeneutical perspective’, Stellenbosch Theological Journal 5(3), 515–540. https://doi.org/10.17570/stj.2019.v5n3.a24

• 109. Nel, M., 2019e, ‘Prophetic witness in weakness: A response to Prof Robert Vosloo from a Pentecostal perspective’, In die Skriflig 53(4), a2419. https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v53i4.2419

• 110. Nel, M., 2019f, ‘The African background of Pentecostal theology: A critical perspective’, In die Skriflig 53(4), a2418. https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v53i4.2418

• 111. Nel, M., 2020a, ‘African Pentecostal spirituality as a mystical tradition: How regaining its roots could benefit Pentecostals’, HTS Teologiese Studies/ Theological Studies 76(4), a5904. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v76i4.5904

• 112. Nel, M., 2020b, ‘A South African view of Pentecostalism as another response to modernism’, In die Skriflig 54(1), a2628. https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v54i1.2628

• 113. Nel, M., 2020c, ‘Charles Parham, WIlliam Seymour en Suid-Afrikaanse pentekostalistiese rassisme’, LitNet Akademies 17(2), 339–358.

• 114. Nel, M., 2020d, ‘Isaiah 53 and its use in the New Testament and classical Pentecostal churches in Southern Africa’, Australasian Pentecostal Studies 21(1), 70–90. https://aps-journal.com/index.php/APS/article/view/9560.

• 115. Nel, M., 2020e, ‘Pentecostal canon of the Bible?’, Journal of Pentecostal Theology 29(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1163/17455251-02901001

• 116. Nel, M., 2020f, ‘Pentecostal hermeneutical reconsideration of the longer ending of Mark 16:9–20’, Verbum et Ecclesia 41(1), a2089. https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v41i1.2089

• 117. Nel, M., 2020g, ‘Spirit Christology: A Pentecostal contribution to the trinitarian discourse’, Scriptura 119(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.7833/119-1-1808

• 118. Nel, M., 2020h, ‘The South African Pentecostal ostrich of corruption’, Theologia Viatorum 44(1), a69. https://doi.org/10.4102/tv.v44i1.69

• 119. Nel, M., 2021a, ‘African prosperity and the world of evil spirits’, Journal of Theology for Southern Africa 148, 89–99.

• 120. Nel, M., 2021b, ‘Changing the narrative language of prosperity in Africa: A Pentecostal hermeneutical challenge’, Journal for the Study of Religion 34(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3027/2021/v34n2a1

• 121. Nel, M., 2021c, ‘Comparison between the respective views of John Calvin and classical Pentecostals on the role of the Holy Spirit in reading the Bible’, HTS Teologiese Studies/ Theological Studies 77(4), a6327. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i4.6327

• 122. Nel, M., 2021d, ‘Defining elements and challenges of a Pentecostal hermeneutics of experience’, HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 77(2), a6622. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i2.6622

• 123. Nel, M., 2021e, ‘Pentecostal engagement with the concept of salvation employed by African Neopentecostalism’, Journal of Pentecostal Theology 30(2), 282–300. https://doi.org/10.1163/17455251-bja10025

• 124. Nel, M., 2021f, ‘Proposing a shift from classical Pentecostal Bible reading and Baconian common sense to a scientific hermeneutics’, Acta Theologica 41(1), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.18820/23099089/actat.v41i1.5

• 125. Nel, M., 2021g, ‘Rethinking hell from a classical Pentecostal perspective: Some ethical considerations’, Stellenbosch Theological Journal 7(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.17570/stj.2021.v7n1.a05

• 126. Nel, M., 2021h, ‘South Africa’, in C. Au, J. Haustein & T.M. Johnson (eds.), Brill’s Encyclopedia of global Pentecostalism, pp. 601–603, Brill, Leiden.

• 127. Nel, M., 2022a, ‘Petitionary prayer for healing and South African Pentecostals’, Journal of Pentecostal Theology 31(2), 295–212. https://doi.org/10.1163/17455251-bja10031

• 128. Nel, M., 2022b, ‘Review of Butinage: The art of religious mobility, by Yonatan N. Gez, Yvan Droz, Jeanne Rey and Edio Soares’, Canadian Journal of African Studies 56(3), 677–678. https://doi.org/10.1080/00083968.2022.2047423

• 129. Nel, M., 2022c, ‘The Bible as a human and fallible book? Contrasting Karl Barth and classical Pentecostal hermeneutical perspectives’, In die Skriflig 56(1), a2821. https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v56i1.2821

• 130. Nel, M., 2023a, ‘Current classical Pentecostal Bible reading methods: A critical perspective’, Theology Today 80(3), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/00405736231190317

• 131. Nel, M., 2023b, ‘Diakonaat en die Afrikaanssprekende AGS van SA’, Verbum et Ecclesia 44(1), a2786. https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v44i1.2786

• 132. Nel, M., 2023c, ‘Glossolalia, spirit baptism and Pentecostals: Revisiting the book of Acts’, Theologia Viatorum 47(1), a222. https://doi.org/10.4102/tv.v47i1.222

• 133. Nel, M., 2023d, ‘Lament: An integral element of Pentecostal worship’, In die Skriflig 57(1), a2991. https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v57i1.2991

• 134. Nel, M., 2023e, ‘Pentecostals and premillennialist dispensationalism: An unhappy marriage’, Journal of Pentecostal Theology 33, 33–56. https://doi.org/10.1163/17455251-bja10055

• 135. Nel, M., 2023f, ‘The Gospel of Mark: An apocalyptic writing?’, Neotestamentica 57(2), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1353/neo.2023.a943175

• 136. Nel, M., 2023g, ‘The prosperity message as a syncretistic deviation to the Gospel of Jesus’, Religions 14(3), 346. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14030346

• 137. Nel, M., 2023h, ‘The question of Mark 13 as an apocalypse’, Verbum et Ecclesia 44(1), a2837. https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v44i1.2837

• 138. Nel, M., 2023i, ‘Vital distinctives of charismatic and Pentecostal Churches’ hermeneutics’, Stellenbosch Theological Journal 9(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.17570/stj.2023.v9n1.a1

• 139. Nel, M., 2024a, ‘Classical Pentecostals’ literalist reading of the Bible: Challenges and solutions’, HTS Teologiese Studies/ Theological Studies 80(1), a9567. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v80i1.9567

• 140. Nel, M., 2024b, ‘Pentecostals’ fatal eschatology of destruction: Implications for a viable eco-theology’, Stellenbosch Theological Journal 10(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.17570/stj.2024.v10n2.20

• 141. Nel, M., 2024c, ‘Potensiaal van Pentekostalistiese prediking om geslagtelike identiteit te vestig’, LitNet Akademies Jaargang 21(1), 445–462. https://doi.org/10.56273/1995-5928/2024/j21n1c1

• 142. Nel, M., 2024d, ‘Prophecy, Pentecostals and South Africa’s socio-economic inequality’, African Journal of Pentecostal Studies 1(1), a14. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajops.v1i1.14

• 143. Nel, M., 2024e, ‘Reflecting on evil and the devil in Pentecostal theodicy’, Religions 15(4), 483. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15040483

• 144. Nel, M., 2025, ‘Romans 1:24–28 and same-sex practice: Some Exegetical remarks’, Religions 16(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16010061

• 145. Nel, M. & Human, D.J., 2000, ‘Die Daniëlboek: Enkele inleidingsprobleme vanuit ‘n laat datering’ [The Book of Daniel: Some introductory questions of a late date], Old Testament Essays 13(3), 293–308.

• 146. Nel, M. & Human, D.J., 2002a, ‘Die Daniëlboek se twee Sitze im Leben’ [The two Sitze im Leben of the Book of Daniel], Hervormde Teologiese Studies 58(4), 1729–1746. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v58i4.716

• 147. Nel, M. & Human, D.J., 2002b, ‘Historiese en sosiale oorsprong(e) van apokaliptiek’ [Historical and social origin(s) of apocalyptic], Hervormde Teologiese Studies 58(3), 1056–1075. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v58i3.598

• 148. Nel, M. &. Janse Van Rensburg, F., 2016, ‘Integrating spirituality and rationality the long and arduous journey of the historical development of theological training in the Apostolic Faith Mission of South Africa’, In die Skriflig 50(2), a1943. https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v50i2.1943

• 149. Nel, M. & Kgatle, M.S., 2024, ‘Introduction to Syncretism and Pentecostalism in the Global South’, Religions 15(6), 636. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15060636

• 150. Olwagen, J.M. & Nel, M., 2008, ‘Die liggaam-van-Christus-metafoor: Instrument vir die effektiewe uitvoering van die missionale opdrag’ [The metaphor of the body of Christ: Instrument for effective execution of the missional assignment], In die Skriflig 2008(2), 327–347. https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v42i2.270

Popular publications

• 151. Nel, M., 2015, Hersien Bybel in Praktyk se Ou en Nuwe Testament aan die hand van die Nuwe Lewende Vertaling. Redakteur vir Ou Testament [Revision of Bible in Practice at the hand of New Living Translation], CUM, Vereeniging.

• 152. Du Rand, J. & Nel, M., 2016, Wat sê die Bybel oor homoseksualiteit? [What does the Bible say about homosexuality?], CUM, Vereeniging.

• 153. Janse Van Rensburg, F. & Nel, M., 2016, Hierna?! Ná die dood – wat wag volgens die Bybel vir die mens [Hereafter? What awaits humankind after death according to the Bible], CUM, Vereeniging.

• 154. Marx, L., Nel, M. & Klopper, J., 2023, The story of John G. Lake: The first general of the AFM of South Africa, National Archives of the AFM of South Africa, Centurion.

• 155. Nel, M., 1991, Geskiedenis van die A.G.S. van S.A. Krugersdorp-Sentraal 1904–1990 [History of the AFM of SA Krugersdorp Central 1904–1990], Management Committee of the AFM Krugersdorp Central, Krugersdorp Printers, Krugerdorp.

• 156. Nel, M., 1992, God genees nog, maar … [God still heals, but…], Evangelie Uitgewers, Johannesburg.

• 157. Nel, M., 1993, ‘n Man deur God in ‘n hoek gedryf [A man driven by God into a corner], John G Lake Stigting, Johannesburg.

• 158. Nel, M., 1995, Elke môre nuut. Dagstukke vir die hele jaar [Each morning new. Devotionals for a year], H. Steyn (red.), Sestig dagstukke geskryf, CUM, Vereeniging.

• 159. Nel, M., 2002, Die Boodskap. Die Bybel in hedendaagse Afrikaans. Vertaling van Deuterononium 17–34 en Esegiël [The Message. The Bible in contemporary Afrikaans. Translation of Deut 17–34 and Ezech], Die Boodskap verwerf in 2003 die CBSA-algehele wenner-prys, CUM, Vereeniging.

• 160. Nel, M., 2003a, Bread upon the waters, 18 bydraes, Carpe Diem, Vanderbijlpark.

• 161. Nel, M., 2003b, Die Bybel A–Z. Genesis 20–50, Jeremia, Esegiël, 1 en 2 Konings, Ou Testamentiese artikels [The Bible A–Z. Gen 20–50, Jer, Ezech, 1 and 2 Kings, Old Testament articles], Die Bybel A–Z verwerf in 2004 die Andrew Murray-prys sowel as CBSA se kategorie-prys vir teologie en naslaan, CUM, Vereeniging.

• 162. Nel, M., 2004, Multivertalingbybel. 1–2 Konings en Genesis 25–50. Kontrolleer kruisverwysings [Multi translation Bible. 1–2 Kings, Gen 12–50, edit cross references], CUM, Vereeniging.

• 163. Nel, M., 2005, Brood op die water – Dagstukkies vir Augustus [Bread upon the water. Devotionals for August], Radiokansel, Pretoria.

• 164. Nel, M., 2006a, Beloftes van God vir ΄n kragtige lewe [Promises of God for a powerful life], Christian Art Gifts, Vereeniging.

• 165. Nel, M., 2006b, Beloftes van God vir ΄n doelgerigte lewe [Promises of God for a purposeful life], Christian Art Gifts, Vereeniging.

• 166. Nel, M., 2006c, Bydraes in Maartens, M (Red.) Deur trauma. Boek 2 [Contributions in Maartens, M (ed.) Through trauma. Book 2], LAPA, Pretoria.

• 167. Nel, M., 2006d, Bydraes in Maartens, M (Red.) Deur trauma. Boek 3. [Contributions in Maartens, M (ed.) Through trauma. Book 3], LAPA, Pretoria.

• 168. Nel, M., 2006e, Bydraes in Maartens, M (Red.) Deur trauma. Boek 4. [Contributions in Maartens, M (ed.) Through trauma. Book 4], LAPA, Pretoria.

• 169. Nel, M., 2006f, Bydraes in Maartens, M (Red.) Deur trauma. Boek 5. [Contributions in Maartens, M (ed.) Through trauma. Book 5], LAPA, Pretoria.

• 170. Nel, M., 2006g, Die Boodskap. Die Bybel in hedendaagse Afrikaans. Hersiene uitgawe. Verantwoordelik vir hersiening van Ou Testament met uitsondering van Deuterononium 17–34 en Esegiël [The Message. The Bible in contemporary Afrikaans. Responsible for revision of Old Testament with exception of Deut 17–34 and Ezech], CUM, Vereeniging.

• 171. Nel, M., 2006h, Leef met selfvertroue. Skrifgebaseerde sleutels tot nuwe selfkennis en die ontsluiting van jou volle potensiaal [Life with self-confidence. Scripture based keys to new knowledge of self and the unlocking of full potential, CUM, Vereeniging.

• 172. Nel, M., 2006i, Nuwe Lewende Vertaling: Verantwoordelik vir 1 Kronieke, Job, Prediker, Jesaja, Esegiël [New Living Translation, in Afrikaans: 1 Chron, Job, Eccles, Isa, Ezech], CUM, Vereeniging.

• 173. Nel, M., 2007, Wat sê die Bybel oor… Die allesomvattende Bybelse gids [What does the Bible say about… A comprehensive biblical guide.], CUM, Vereeniging.

• 174. Nel, M., 2018, Wanneer die Bybel nie sin maak nie, 124, pp, CUM.

• 175. Nel, M. & Eksteen, A., 2012, Stem in die stilte [Voice in the silence], CUM, Vereeniging.

• 176. O’Kennedy, D., Du Rand, J., Ludik, B., Nel, M. & Van Der Spuy, D., 2019, 52 weke van geestelike groei: ’n Tematiese Bybelstudie oor 11 hooftemas in die Skrif, CUM, Vereeniging.

• 177. Van Rensburg, F.J. (red.), 2011, Contribution to Conceiving a sermon: From exegesis to the sermon, Medewerkers: De Klerk, B J, De Wet, F W, Lamprecht, A, Nel, M, Vergeer, W, Van Rensburg, F J, Potchefstroom Teologiese Publikasies, Potchefstroom.

• 178. Van Rensburg, F.J. & Nel, M. (red.), 2009, Bybellenium. Eenvolumekommentaar [Biblenium: A one volume commentary], CUM, Vereeniging.

Chapters in books

• 179. Nel, M., 1986, ‘Die charismatiese gemeente, en die siek kind in haar midde’, Baccalaureus Divinitatis-skripsie, Universiteit van Suid-Afrika [The charismatic congregation, and the sick child, Bdiv dissertation, University of South Africa].

• 180. Nel, M., 1990, ‘Jeug en erediens. Begeleiding van die A.G.S.-jeug tot geestelike volwassenheid in die erediens’, Doctor Theologiae-proefskrif, Universiteit van Suid-Afrika [Youth and worship service: Accompaniment of AFM youth to spiritual maturity in the worship service, DTh dissertation, University of South Africa].

• 181. Nel, M., 1992, ‘Die leerstelling van goddelike genesing soos dit in die Apostoliese Geloof Sending van Suid-Afrika ontwikkel het: ‘n kerkhistoriese perspektief’, Doctor Divinitatis-proefskrif, Universiteit van Pretoria [The doctrine of divine healing as practised in the AFM of SA: A church historical perspective, DD dissertation, University of Pretoria].

• 182. Nel, M., 1996, ‘Eva Stuart – Woman pioneer in the Pentecostal movement’, in C. Landman (red.), Digging up our foremothers: Stories of women in Africa, pp. 365–385, Unisa Publishers, Pretoria.

• 183. Nel, M., 1997, ‘n Aktualisering van die apokaliptiese openbarings in die Daniëlboek’, Magister Divinitatis-verhandeling, Universiteit van Pretoria [Actualisation of the apocalyptic revelations in the Book of Daniel. MTh dissertation, University of Pretoria].

• 184. Nel, M., 2001, ‘‘n Teologies-hermeneutiese ondersoek na Daniël 1 en 2’, Ph D-proefskrif, Universiteit van Pretoria [A theological and hermeneutical investigation into Daniel 1 and 2, PhD dissertation, University of Pretoria].

• 185. Nel, M., 2002, ‘Die bydrae van die NG Kerk tot die ontstaan van die Pinksterbeweging’ [The contribution of the Dutch Reformed Church to the origins of the Pentecostal movement], in Coertzen, P. (red.), 350 Jaar Gereformeerd / 350 Years Reformed: 1652–2002, pp. 310–319, CLF, Bloemfontein.

• 186. Nel, M., 2005, ‘Reconciliation in Jewish apocalyptic literature’, in J. Van Der Watt, D. Human & G. Steyn (eds.), Friendship and love where there were none, Biblical perspectives on reconciliation, pp. 68–82, LIT Verlag, Munich.

• 187. Nel, M., 2006, ‘View of time in ancient cultures, and the origin of apocalypticism in Jewish thought in the centuries before Christ’, in H.M. Niemann & M. Augustin (eds.), Stimulation from Leiden: Collected communications to the XVIIIth Congress of the International Organization for the study of the Old Testament, Leiden 2004, pp. 207–217, Peter Lang, Frankfurt.

• 188. Nel, M., 2008, ‘Myth and Daniel 7’, in D.J. Human (ed.), Psalms and mythology, Library of Hebrew Bible / Old Testament Studies, vol. 462, pp. 217–230, T & T Clark, New York, NY.

• 189. Nel, M., 2009, ‘Disputes about the calendar in Jewish apocalyptic literature and its basis’, in J.T. Fitzgerald, F.J. Van Rensburg & H.F. Van Rooy (eds.), Animosity, the Bible and us: Some European, North American and South African perspectives, Global Perspectives on Biblical Scholarship, Number 12, pp. 59–86, Society of Biblical Literature, Atlanta, GA.

• 190. Nel, M., 2014a, ‘Function of Mark 13 in the early Church’, in M. Nel, J. Van Der Watt & F.J. Van Rensburg (reds.), The New Testament in the Graeco-R oman world: Articles in honor of Abe Malherbe, Theology in Africa, vol. 4, pp. 294–312, LIT Verlag, München.

• 191. Nel, M., 2014b, ‘Sin’, in R.L. Brawley (ed.), Oxford Encyclopedia of the Bible and ethics, pp. 286–286, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

• 192. Nel, M., 2017, ‘The Pentecostal movement, a grandchild of the reformation’, in K. Gerber (ed.), Reformation 500: Some South African perspectives, pp. 74–88, Christian Literature Fund, Wellington.

• 193. Nel, M., 2018, ‘Defining a Pentecostal Hermeneutic for Africa’, in B. Melanie (ed.), Text and context: Vernacular approaches to the Bible in global Christianity, Contrapuntal readings of the Bible in World Christianity, pp. 11–30, Pickwick, Eugene, OR.

• 194. Nel, M., 2020a, ‘African neopentecostalism’s emphasis on prosperity and its implications for its Christology: An African pentecostal hermeneutical consideration’, in S. Kgatle, M. Nel & C. Banda (eds.), Paradigm shifts in Christology: Jesus in various lenses of South African Pentecostalism, pp. 124–139, NRF, Routledge, Abington.

• 195. Nel, M., 2020b, ‘Evaluating “prophecy” as a South African Neo-Pentecostal pastoral response to the challenges of xenophobia’, in A.R. Brunsdon (ed.), The human dilemma of displacement: Towards a practical theology and ecclesiology of home, pp. 103–127, AOSIS. NRF, Cape Town, Routledge, Abington.

• 196. Nel, M., 2020c, ‘Pentecostals confronting structural poverty: An ecclesiastical strategy to make a difference in the lives of poor people in sub-Saharan Africa’, in M. Bøsterud & J.C.M. Venter (eds.), Christian ethics and political economy: Markers for a developing South Africa, Reformed Theology in Africa Series, vol. 3, pp. 189–205, AOSIS, Cape Town.

• 197. Nel, M., 2020d, ‘Pentecostals confronting structural poverty: An ecclesiastical strategy to make a difference in the lives of poor people in sub-Saharan Africa’, in M. Bøsterud & J.C.M. Venter (eds.), Christian ethics and political economy: Markers for a developing South Africa, Reformed Theology in Africa Series, vol. 3, pp. 189–205, AOSIS, Cape Town.

• 198. Nel, M., 2022a, ‘Freedom to speak in tongues, even in the laboratory! Pentecostal hermeneutics encountering science’, in N. Vorster & F. Van Niekerk (eds.), Faith seeking understanding, pp. 63–85, AOSIS. NRF, Cape Town.

• 199. Nel, M., 2022b, ‘Freedom to speak in tongues, even in the laboratory! Pentecostal hermeneutic encountering science’, in N. Vorster & F. Van Niekerk (eds.), Faith seeking understanding, pp. 63–86, AOSIS, Cape Town.

• 200. Nel, M., 2022c, ‘Pentecostal hermeneutics for Africa: Definition and application’, in H. Goede & N. Vorster (eds.), Christian Hermeneutics in South Africa, pp. 39–64, AOSIS. NRF, Cape Town.

• 201. Nel, M., 2022d, ‘Pentecostal hermeneutics for Africa: Definition and application’, in N. Vorster & H. Goede (eds.), Christian hermeneutics in South Africa, pp. 39–64, AOSIS, Cape Town.

• 202. Nel, M., 2023a, ‘Miracle prosperity and business practices of Africa’s prosperity teachers’, in M.S. Kgatle, J. Sello Thinane & C. Kaunda (eds.), Commercialisation of religion in South Africa: A Pentecostal approach, pp. 83–100, Palgrave Macmillan. NRF, Cham.

• 203. Nel, M., 2023b, ‘Prayer in Daniel’, in A.J. Coetzee (ed.) Biblical theology of prayer in the Old Testament, Biblical theology of prayer in the Old Testament, Reformed Theology in Africa Series, vol. 12, pp. 149–174, AOSIS Books, Cape Town.

• 204. Nel, M., 2023c, ‘Reconciliation in Jewish apocalyptic literature: A South African perspective’, in J. Knoetze & J. Pillay (eds.), Christ’s love moves us to reconciliation and unity: An ecumenical challenge in Africa, pp. 61–66, Barnabas Academic. NRF, Wellington.

• 205. Nel, M., 2024a, ‘Pastors of the Apostolic Faith Mission of South Africa and Spiritual Disciplines: An empirical study’, in S. Joynt (ed.), The spiritual practices of South African clergy: State of the clergy, pp. 93–106, Bloomsbury, New York, NY.

• 206. Nel, M., 2024b, ‘Prophetic Neo-Pentecostal Churches and the theodicy challenge’, in S. Kgatle, S. Mookgo, A. Reddie & C. Banda (eds.), African new prophetic Pentecostalism and human flourishing: A South African perspective, vol. 8, pp. 203–225, Peter Lang. Religion and society in Africa, New York, NY.

• 207. Nel, M., 2025, ‘Remembering and commemorating the theological legacy of John G. Lake’, in L. Marx, M. Nel & J. Klopper (eds.), The diary of John G. Lake, pp. 7–30, Qum, Heidelberg.

• 208. Nel, M. & Kgatle, M.S. (eds.), 2024, Syncretism and Pentecostalism in the Global South, MDPI, Basel.

• 209. Nel, M., Van Der Watt, J. & Van Rensburg, F.J. (eds.), 2015, The New Testament in the Graeco-Roman world: Articles in honor of Abe Malherbe, Theology in Africa, vol. 4, LIT Verlag, München.