Original Research

Pentecostal discourses on regulatory oversight by the Cultural, Religious and Linguistic Rights Commission in South Africa

Thalukanyo C.M. Sadiki, Mashudu E. Muthivhi
African Journal of Pentecostal Studies | Vol 3, No 1 | a130 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/ajops.v3i1.130 | © 2026 Thalukanyo C.M. Sadiki, Mashudu E. Muthivhi | This work is licensed under Other
Submitted: 03 March 2026 | Published: 21 July 2026

About the author(s)

Thalukanyo C.M. Sadiki, Department of Human Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education, University of Venda, Thohoyandou, South Africa
Mashudu E. Muthivhi, Department of Human Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education, University of Venda, Thohoyandou, South Africa

Abstract

Background: The Commission for the Promotion and Protection of the Rights of Cultural, Religious and Linguistic Communities (CRL Rights Commission) have made many attempts to promote accountability and protect followers from exploitation by religious practitioners, but significant tensions remain between the government and the church.
Objectives: This article investigates Pentecostal discourses surrounding government intervention, spiritual authority, divine calling and ministry leadership within the context of regulatory oversight by the CRL Rights Commission in South Africa. Moreover, it examines how Neo-Pentecostal and New Prophetic churches respond to the Constitution’s proposed regulations and to Spirit-based pastoral legitimacy in the existing literature. It critically analyses the relationship between the proposed regulatory framework for pastoral leaders and the CRL Rights Commission, as it pertains to Neo-Pentecostal churches and New Prophetic churches across South Africa.
Methods: The qualitative, interpretive study uses a combination of policy analysis, theological literature and media framing of Neo-Pentecostal churches and New Prophetic church leaders from diverse organisations and contexts. The study advocates for a dialogical, context-sensitive regulatory paradigm to embrace Pentecostal epistemologies and ethical accountability in religious organisations.
Results: The findings reveal that tensions between CRL regulatory oversight and Spirit-led Pentecostal authority arise from competing understandings of legitimacy, accountability, and religious freedom. They further show that Pentecostal churches increasingly respond to regulatory pressures through internal accountability mechanisms, ethical reforms, and engagement with broader socio-political expectations.
Conclusion: The study concludes that effective regulation of Pentecostal churches in South Africa requires a collaborative, context sensitive, and participatory approach that promotes ethical accountability while respecting Spirit-led leadership, Pentecostal theological perspectives, and religious freedom, thereby fostering trust between regulatory authorities and faith communities.
Contribution: It contributes to the ongoing conversation about contemporary religion-state relations in South Africa and builds a framework for co-operative, collaborative, and trust-based accountability.


Keywords

charismatic practice; CRL Rights Commission; Pentecostalism; pastoral leadership; religious regulation; spiritual authority; public policy

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 16: Peace, justice and strong institutions

Metrics

Total abstract views: 329
Total article views: 425


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.